Captain harish uppal vs union of india
WebApr 12, 2024 · The Bench suggested that in view of judgment of this Court in Ex Captain Harish Uppal versus Union of India (2003) 2 SCC 45, such suspension of work or strikes are clearly illegal and it is high time that the legal fraternity realizes its duty to the society, which is the foremost. It was also held that, 'The condolence references can be once ... WebIn view of judgment of this Court in Ex. Captain Harish Uppal versus Union of India[18], such suspension of work or strikes are clearly illegal and it is high time that the legal fraternity realizes its duty to the society which is the foremost. Condolence references can be once in while periodically say once in two/three months and not frequently.
Captain harish uppal vs union of india
Did you know?
WebUnion of India, (1998) 4 SCC 409 (A judgment by a five judge Bench) with Pravin C. Shah v. K.A. Mohd. Ali, (2001) 8 SCC 650 (A judgment by a two judge Bench), Ex. Capt Harish Uppal v. Union of India, (2003) 2 SCC 45 (A judgment by a three judge bench), Bar Council of India v. High Court WebCase law : Ex. Captain Harish Uppal Vs The UOI in writ petition (Civil) 132 of 1988 Citation of this case is AIR 2003 SC 739. This is a landmark judgment of the Supreme Court of India in which the question – “Whether the lawyers have a right to go on a strike?” was decided The parties to this case are : 1 Captain Harish Uppal- Petitioner 2 of India and another …
WebSep 15, 2024 · Ex-Capt. Harish Uppal v. Union of India (2003) 2 SCC 45 – One Stop destination for DU LLB students Ex-Capt. Harish Uppal v. Union of India (2003) 2 SCC 45 Posted on September 15, 2024 by dullbonline Ex-Capt. Harish Uppal v. Union of India (2003) 2 SCC 45 indiankanoon.org link casemine.com link legitquest.com link Webcases of Ex-Capt. Harish Uppal v. Union of India (2003) 2 SCC 45; Common Cause, A Registered Society v. Union of India (2006) 9 SCC 295 and Krishnakant Tamrakar v. State of M.P. (2024) 17 SCC 27. 6.1 In the case of Ex-Capt. Harish Uppal (supra), this Court has specifically observed and held that the lawyers have no right to go on strike or even ...
WebDecision in Ex. Capt. Harish Uppal v. Union of India Air 2003 SC 739 Whether a Right Decision in the Right Direction. Administration of justice is one of the most essential … WebDec 17, 2002 · Supreme Court of India Ex-Capt. Harish Uppal vs Union Of India & Anr on 17 December, 2002 Author: S N Variava Bench: Cji, Doraiswamy Raju, S. N. Variava, D. M. Dharmadhikari CASE NO.: PETITIONER: Ex-Capt. Harish Uppal RESPONDENT: Union of India & Anr. DATE OF JUDGMENT: 17/12/2002 BENCH: CJI, DORAISWAMY RAJU, S. …
WebApr 3, 2024 · Captain Harish Uppal vs Union Of India And Others on 27 November, 1972. the Customs Act, 1962. The Registration Act, 1908. ... The proposition finds support from the judgment of the Supreme Court in Ex. Capt. Harish Uppal v. UOI & Ors. reported in 2003 (2) SCC 45. 50. As observed above, there is no specific denial that in large number …
WebEx Capt. Harish Uppal Vs Union of India Case Whether Lawyers have Right to Strike Case 3,762 views May 12, 2024 77 Dislike Share Save The Constitution 52.9K … list the number of employee in each countryThe Supreme Court of India concluded that the strike by an advocate is considered unlawful and illicit. A strike might be allowed in the most extraordinary of the uncommon … See more The Constitution of India: 1. Article 226: Powers given to the court to issue writs. 2. Article 145: defines the rules of court. The Advocates Act: 1. Section 7: Functions of the Bar Council of … See more impact on lgbt students in high schoolWebOF THE CASE: EX-CAPT. HARISH UPPAL V. UNION OF INDIA. Aditya Gupta, Presidency University, Bangalore. ABSTRACT. Right to strike is a Fundamental Right as provided under Article 19(1)(c) of the Indian Constitution. Under the umbrella of this Freedom Advocates also go on to strike. This right of strike of Advocates is always in question and ... impact on lifestyle